It was a crisp, clear night, the kind that beckoned me outside to photograph the moon in the hopes of capturing anomalous structures on the lunar surface. I was outside, my Nikon P900 camera precisely mounted on my tripod, diligently taking a series of photographs of the moon. My primary goal, as it had been for months, was to meticulously scan the lunar surface, hoping against hope to capture any anomalous structures that might hint at something beyond the natural, the expected. The following morning, as I meticulously reviewed the high-resolution images on my computer screen, pixel by painstaking pixel, a tiny anomaly caught my eye within the stark, cratered landscape. At first, it was just a faint speck, but as I zoomed in, sharpened the focus, and adjusted the contrast, a cold shock ran through me, followed by an exhilarating surge of adrenaline. There it stood, stark and undeniable: a colossal, perfectly upright rectangular monolith, its dark, featureless expanse absorbing the sparse lunar light. Its sheer, unblemished geometry screamed of design.
This wasn’t a trick of light, not a geological formation, not lunar pareidolia. It was clearly artificial. The object was immense, dwarfing nearby craters, its impossibly sharp edges slicing a long, inky shadow across the pockmarked lunar monolith, a testament to its imposing height and the low angle of the sun. The shadow itself was a dead giveaway — it was crisp, uniform, and utterly consistent with a towering, perfectly straight edifice. This was rather astonishing, a discovery that sent a shiver down my spine, for it reminded me very much of the infamous Phobos monolith, that equally enigmatic structure standing on one of the moons of Mars. The parallel was chilling, almost a cosmic signature. Could it be? Two moons, two colossal, deliberately placed monuments? The implications hit me like a physical blow. It would seem that sometime in the distant past, an unimaginably advanced intelligence had the ability to not only carve these huge megalithic structures but to transport or construct them, and erect them upright with such precision on distant celestial bodies. This is simply incredible, mind-boggling in its scope and mystery. Who possessed the unfathomable technology and resources to accomplish such a feat? An ancient, long-vanished precursor civilization from our own solar system? An interstellar beacon left by visitors from beyond our sun? A monument to a forgotten triumph or tragedy?
A silent, eternal sentinel? And for what profound purpose were these colossal sentinels erected? Are they markers, observatories, power conduits, or perhaps even warnings to those who might one day venture into the cosmos? The discovery has become an obsession. It’s a compelling, haunting mystery that fuels my nights. I continue to photograph the moon throughout its every phase, from slender crescent to luminous full, hoping to capture more of these incredible structures, to glean another clue, another fragment of truth about the silent, artificial giants that stand watch over our nearest celestial neighbor, whispering secrets of an unimaginable past. Check out the photographs and the enlargements and enhancements I made. This is incredible and clearly shows a carved stone monolith structure on the moon. If only NASA would focus on real anomalous megalithic structures like this that of been placed upright on the moon, but then again, that would be real scientific exploration and NASA is only there to cover up the truth and spread phony lies, like that of all the fake moon landings. The Photograph was taken at 10:16 PM on the 4th of September 2025 from Devon, England. All the best John.
MY FRIEND JOHN MOONER IS THE CHIEF INVESTIGATOR FOR WORLD UFO PHOTOS AND NEWS.ORG. AND WORLD UFO PHOTOS.
See Johns web site here >> John Mooner Ufologist
KEN PFEIFER WORLD UFO PHOTOS AND NEWS
U-TUBE KEN PFEIFER https://youtu.be/2pP0vw-nlpY
https://worldufophotosandnews.org
GOOGLE…..KEN PFEIFER DISCOVERIES
DUCK DUCK GO…….KEN PFEIFER UFO
Several years after the surgical removal of their alleged alien implants, five individuals courageously accepted to take part in an interview to discuss their “before and after effects”. All persons, one male and four females, shared one thing in common: UFO encounters and contact with non-human alien beings.
The alleged implants removed from the first set of surgeries were studied by two different pathologists, and then sent to various independent laboratories for extensive scientific analysis. The tests performed on these alleged alien implants were: a pathology/tissue evaluation, laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), extensive metallurgical testing involving a density immersion test, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction pattern analysis and electron/magnetic and fluorescence property analysis. Isotopic range tests are also in progress. Tests were conducted by the National Institute of Discovery of Science (NIDS), New Mexico Tech, and other independent sources.
Most of the implantees described noteworthy mental, psychic or health related changes following their implant surgeries. Four of them reported a continuation of some type of alien abduction activity. The two women who had the “biological” type implants removed, experienced strikingly similar post surgical changes, involving shooting pains and reddening of the incision scar for a short period of time. The important thing to consider here, is the whole clinical picture. Over reliance on the physical test results of the implants alone are not substantial enough to solve the implant mystery – let alone the question of the alien presence. If not, then what is? The lives and experiences of the abductees themselves, tell us that we need to stop and listen. The answer lies somewhere in between science and the hearts of the people.
SEPTEMBER 1976 ……………RAVENNA ITALY
SEPTEMBER 10, 1951………….FORT MONMOUTH NEW JERSEY
In fact, so fast was the object moving, that radar operators (a second operator also began to track the object shortly after it appeared) had to switch to manual tracking “in order to hold the target”. They would continue to do this for the “maximum tracking range of 32,000 yards”. Furthermore, the object was moving “at a speed several hundred miles per hour higher than the maximum aided tracking ability of the radar sets”. In short, then, that it might have been an incident due to radar operator error was ruled out, as both operators quite obviously tracked the same object and experienced the same difficulties in doing so. And with that in mind, equipment error can also be ruled out, as both radar controls ran as exactly as they should have given their capabilities. That the two operators’ sighting was the same as the object seen by the two experienced aircraft pilots is almost beyond doubt. NOTE: The above image is CGI.
